No Gravatar

Welcome back!

Are you looking at major change in your workplace next year? Harvard Business School reports that two of every three change initiatives fail. Why? Because they fail to help staff adapt to and adopt new ways of working. People are the power behind any change and they also have the power to hinder its success.

Our unique, Teams & Change program is a one day course designed to help your team make lasting changes in the way they go about their work. The hands on course will help your staff understand how they and others react to change, and what they need to do successfully transition into a new way of working.

Want more? Book a course in November, to be conducted in January and pay just $4,990^. That is $1,000 off the normal price and includes a personality type assessment, a workbook and texts for each participant.

Contact us at deborah@leadershipdevelopment.edu.au now to lock in a date and secure your discount!

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Leader vs. Leadership Development

by Deborah Kendell on November 22, 2009 · 1 comment

in Leadership Development

No Gravatar

Have you moved beyond leader development and into the emerging realm of leadership development?

Traditionally, organizations have focused on developing individuals so that they can become better leaders. This is known as leader development.

However, there is growing recognition that leadership is also a collective force, affected by the way leaders interact with and complement each other. When leaders act on their own, they often work at cross-purposes and inhibit the work of their colleagues. This can result in silos, turf wars and a “my patch” mentality.

Leadership development is aimed at aligning the efforts of leaders and strengthening the connection between them.

“To expand leadership capacity, organizations must not only develop the leadership capacities of indivduals but also develop the leadership capacity of collectives”
—Ellen Van Velsor & Cynthia McCauley

An example of leadership development in action is our Collective Wisdom program, where leadership teams learn how to make better decisions as a group.

{ 1 comment }

Collective Wisdom

by Shaun Killian on November 22, 2009 · 1 comment

in Leadership Development, Public Courses

No Gravatar

½-Day Program

Leadership is very much about sizing up situations and making intelligent choices about how to best proceed. Yet, research shows that the saying two heads are better than one is true. With the right intent and the right process, groups come up with solutions that are measurably better than any individual can devise on their own. Sadly, most leadership teams don’t know how to work collectively and many are not really teams at all. Rather, they are a group of specialized individuals who fail to see beyond their patch. Your challenge is to learn how to harness the collective wisdom of your team.

This ½-day program is designed for intact leadership teams (or boards or similar). Participants in the program will learn how to use the art of round tabling to bring their collective wisdom to bear on any creative challenge facing the group.

Cost:                $399 per person, teams can be 3–8 people.

Collective Wisdom is on in Brisbane on 18 Feb 2010 .

Strengthen your leadership at the collective level.

Register your leadership team today!

or Download a full program brochure

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Hard Conversations

by Shaun Killian on October 9, 2009

in General

No Gravatar

Can you be a more effective leader in 2010 than in 2009? If you learn Hard Conversationshow to hold hard but powerful conversations, the answer is a resounding yes! Sometimes it is hard to find the time to talk to people, and some conversations can be decidedly unpleasant. However, your words (or lack of them) can have a powerful impact on those you lead. As renowned author Susan Scott once said, you are in the situation that you are in today—the good and the bad—because of the conversations you have had or failed to have with those around you.

Our popular Hard Conversations program will teach you how to harness the potent power of words to enhance your leadership impact. Specifically, you will learn how to use words to provide strategic encouragement, to call behaviour and to coach your staff to higher levels of performance.

“Very practical! I feel I will be a better leader as a result of this course.”

Tanya Harch, Qld Health

“The structure you gave us will allow me to give feedback with confidence and finesse!”

Donna Fichera, Tatts Group

“I can now use my personal leadership style and coaching conversations to deliver the business outcomes we need.”

Claudio Iseppon, Brisbane City Council

There is only one last Hard Conversations program on in Brisbane this year. Our last two programs booked out early, so don’t miss out.

When: Wednesday 9 December

Where: Brisbane CBD

Cost: $549

Register online today to secure your place!

Title: Hard Conversations
Location: Brisbane
Description: Discover how to correctly use feedback, coaching and confrontation to shape the attitudes and actions of staff.
Date: 2009-12-09

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

No Gravatar

One the most common challenges your managers will face is juggling the many demands on their time in a way that their most important work gets done. Therefore, offering training in time management is always going to be a popular way for you to build your reputation as someone who truly helps people become more effective at work.

We do not offer time management training. However, I would happily recommend two companies that do. Neither of these companies has any affiliation with us. I recommend them to you based on personal experience, and the experiences of my close colleagues.

The first company is Franklin Covey and the second is Priority Management.

I encourage anyone who has personal experience with other quality providers to share them here (no self-promotion please).

{ 0 comments }

No Gravatar

Have you been asked to design a high-potential leadership program but don’t know where to start? The key lies in selecting participants who genuinely show a high potential to lead well.

Traditionally, HR managers work on the assumption that past performance is the best predictor of future performance, which is why behavioural interviews and reference checks continue to be popular selection techniques. However, it is likely that your potential candidates will have little if any experience in leadership. While they may be great at their current job, leadership requires a different set of abilities. An effective staff member gets good results by doing good work themselves, while an effective leader gets good results by getting the best from those they lead. The best individual player on a team does not necessarily make the best captain or coach. Past success cannot predict future success when the demands and nature of the role are completely different to those of the past. It is therefore a mistake to select candidates with perceived high potential based on their past performance.

1

Another strategy that we often see organisations use to select high-potential leaders is through the recommendations made by candidates’ managers. We do not recommend using this method. It is not an effective or reliable way to identify people with a high potential for leading well. Relying on someone else’s word is equivalent to selecting someone based on comparative reference checks and is only a fraction more reliable than flipping a coin 1. This is not surprising, as managers are subconsciously prone to seeing potential in staff with whom they get along and who share similar traits or approaches. This is likely to result in many candidates with a true potential to lead being passed over simply because their style differs from that of their existing boss. Furthermore, some managers actively seek to develop future leaders whilst others do not. As a result, you are likely to again overlook another group with true high potential simply because their managers don’t value developing others.

Sadly, HR’s two favourite selection techniques are ill suited to the task of identifying candidates with high potential for leadership. So how can you go about assessing potential? There is an answer, but an imperfect one. You need to take a small slice of information about a host of people, and use this information to make predictions about how suited each person is to a career in leadership. Like any form of prediction, there are no absolute guarantees. Yet there are reliable and inexpensive ways that maximise your chance of being right most of the time. Using these methods stacks the odds in your favour. It is similar to being the “house” in a casino. While there may be occasions when individuals surprise or disappoint you (against the odds), overall the house always wins. It takes just three simple steps, each of which filters out candidates based on their:selecting-high-potential-leaders

  1. Desire
  2. Ability
  3. Inclination

Desire

Desire is assessed by inviting people to self-nominate for the program. Doing so will determine whether they are truly interested in a career in leadership and are willing to devote the time to balancing the extra demands of learning with the actual work placements that they will undertake. Research shows that a trait shared by most effective leaders is simply the desire to lead others 2. [S. Kirkpatrick & E. Locke (1991), ‘Leadership: Do Traits Matter’, Academy of Management Executive]. Therefore, it is best to initially cast a wide net in your search for prospective candidates and subsequently narrow down your list with two more screening techniques.

Ability

Ability is assessed using intelligence tests. Despite popular opinion to the contrary, there is a clear link between intelligence and effective leadership 2. IQ tests fell out of favour for many reasons. Firstly, IQ alone is not enough to guarantee that someone will be a good leader, but it remains a prerequisite. Even Daniel Goleman, the psychologist who popularized emotional intelligence, admits that IQ is an essential threshold competency for leaders 3. A second reason IQ tests fell out of favour centred on the notion that leaders are made, not born. There is indeed some truth in this statement. Otherwise, all leadership development would be a waste of time. However, people are not equally “developable”. Your job is a bit like the work undertaken by the Australian Institute of Sport. You must first find the raw talent, then actively put in place a range of strategies to develop this talent and keep it within your organisation. Without raw talent, even the best development strategies produce mediocre results. Yet talent that is not supported and encouraged is wasted potential.

Tendency

A key weakness of intelligence tests is that they test ability but fail to measure less tangible aspects of potential such as personal drive and interpersonal savvy. These are not competencies per se, but rather deeply engrained tendencies that underpin the way we habitually act and interact with others. People with certain tendencies or traits are more likely to lead well and to develop new leadership capabilities 4. These traits include self-monitoring, self-confidence, energy and extroversion. In some organisations where innovation and improvement are critical, leaders also need to be creative and adaptable. To be clear, a person does not need to possess all of these tendencies or traits to be a good leader. However, the more they possess, the more likely it is that they will lead well, which gets to the very heart of assessing potential. You can assess the tendencies of your applicants using specially crafted personality tests. Such tests, when used on their own, are not a great predictor of leadership potential, but when used in tandem with IQ tests, they provide a more accurate prediction than any other selection technique.

3

It is therefore important that personality tests are administered last. This allows you to consider and weigh both ability and aspects of personality to make your final decision about whom to include in your high-potential group.

  1. I. Robertson, & M. Smith (2001), ‘Personnel selection’ Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 441-472; M. Cook (1998), Personnel selection: Adding value through people, (3rd ed.). NY: John Wiley & Sons; P. Sullivan (1991), Paper presented at IPMA Seminar, 19 September.
  2. See for example the meta-analysis of research conducted by R. Lord, C. DeVader & M. Alliger
  3. D. Goleman (1998), ‘What Makes A Leader?’, Harvard Business Review.
  4. Northouse, P. (2006). Leadership: Theory & Practice, Sage; Robbins, S., Millett, B., & Waters-Marsh, T. (2004). Organisational Behaviour (4th ed.). Sydney: Prentice-Hall; House, R., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. (2004), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Sage; S.,Foti, R. & Kenny, D. (1991). Self monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership, Journal of Applied Psychology, April, 308-315; and Dobbins, G., Long, W., Dedrick, E. & Clemons, T. (1990). The role of self-monitoring and gender in leader emergence, Journal of Management, September, 609-61; Locke, E. (1999). The Essence of Leadership, Lexington Books

{ 1 comment }

Seven Sins of Poor Presentations

by Shaun Killian on September 1, 2009 · 1 comment

in Presentations

No Gravatar

HR and L&D professionals are often called upon to give a presentation. From running training sessions to persuading senior managers that training is necessary, mastering the art of presentations is essential to your success. Leaders such as Barack Obama, Winston Churchill and Martin Luther King know how to connect with and move an audience. But these men are exceptional, and as your own personal experience would probably confirm, many people just do not know how to present well. In exploring why this is so, we discovered seven recurring themes that are frequently the root of poor presentations. We call them the Seven Sins of Poor Presentations, for they are tempting traps that busy presenters can easily fall into.

  1. Vague intent
  2. Not understanding your audience
  3. Poor structure
  4. Low engagement
  5. Insufficient rehearsal
  6. Lack of presence
  7. Poor use of visuals

Read on to find out more about each of these sins and how you can stop them from hindering your presentation’s success.

Vague Intent

what-is-the-purpose-of-your-presentationIf you are not clear about what you want your presentation to achieve1, then its success will be a hit-and-miss affair at best. What is the purpose of your presentation? While the specifics will vary, you generally give presentations for one of two reasons2:

  1. To inform and educate
  2. To persuade and build buy-in

Having a clear understanding of the presentation’s purpose enables you to set more specific goals3. If your aim is to inform, then your goals will describe what you want people to know and/or be able to do by the end of the presentation. If your aim is to persuade, then your goals will describe how you want people feel, what you want people to believe and/or what you want people to do at the end of the presentation. Being clear about what you want your presentation to achieve will enable you to make wise decisions about how to best structure and deliver it.

Not Understanding Your Audience

A great presentation given to one audience may fall flat when repeated with another. Why? Because people are different and you need to personalise your presentation for the specific audience concerned4. Personalised presentations help you build a connection with your audience and frame your ideas in a way that resonates with the realities of their world. Therefore, you need to devote some preparation time to better understanding your audience.

  • What have they been up to recently? What have they achieved?
  • Will they be hostile or receptive to what you have to say?
  • What do they already know or believe about the matter at hand?
  • What do you know about their learning styles and personalities?
  • What challenges do they face in their workplace? What help do they need?
  • What do they like and respect?

To truly understand your audience, you need to avoid the clinical, somewhat removed method of answering these questions and try to view things from their perspective. If your aim is to:

  • Inform and educate, you need to ensure that you explain the material in a way that is relevant to them.
  • Persuade and build buy-in, then you need to show them how your idea will help them achieve something that they desire and/or avoid something that they fear.

In either case, you need to show your understanding and highlight how you are similar to them early in your presentation.

Poor Structure

I am often amazed at how little attention presenters give to the structure of their presentation. Structure will allow you to deliver a cohesive presentation that achieves your intent.

A basic structure you can use to organise all of your presentations is introduction, body and conclusion. However, it is not as simple as the popular “tell them what you will be saying, say it, and tell them what you have said” formula. If your aim is educate and inform, then your introduction should provide a road map of how you have organised the content5. Then, if it is a long presentation, show the slide again as you conclude each section. This helps your audience keep track of where they have been, and where are going. However, your introduction is far more than a contents page. A great introduction needs to capture your audience’s attention6 and build a connection between you and them7.

The body of an informative presentation is usually organised into chunks of related content. This structure makes sense because it mirrors what we know about the way the human mind stores information8, and connects it to what the audience already knows. You then need to sequence these chunks of content so that new information connects to and, if possible, builds on what has gone before9.

You need to structure the body of a persuasive presentation differently. In essence, you follow the problem-solution model10, in which you convince the audience that they have a problem and then persuade them to accept your proposed solution. It may be tempting to launch straight into your proposal and the reasons behind it. However, it is far more effective to establish consensus on the problem your audience faces before telling them what they should do and why they should do it.

A great conclusion is far more than a boring rehash of your main points. Rather, it is future focused, pointing your audience towards what they should do as a result of what they have learned from your presentation11.

Low Engagement

Whether you are presenting an in-house program or you work as a corporate presenter, you are working with adults who are not used to sitting and listening all day. Therefore, you need to think of ways to actively engage them.

One of the most powerful ways to accomplish this is through storytelling12. A good story is engaging because it sparks our imagination and plays to our innate desire to know what happens next. We naturally project the messages contained in stories onto our current situation and our past experiences. You can source stories from pertinent personal anecdotes, from popular movies and from both traditional and business parables. You can also extend the use of stories through case studies, simulations and drama.

Of course, there are other ways to engage your audience13. These include using:

  • Questions both real and rhetorical, to get people thinking about what you have said
  • Games that reinforce the key messages in your presentation
  • Movement to wake people up
  • Literary devices such as parallel structure, word pictures, triads, metaphors and the antithesis

Poor Preparation

To deliver an effective presentation, you have to know your material well14. Audiences can sense when you are relying on a script or using your slides as a crutch to hide your lack of knowledge. A lack of preparation can also throw off your timing, leaving you to:

  • Cram an overload of information into the time you have left, or
  • Come up with ways to fill your remaining time

To get your timing right, you need to rehearse your presentation15. Actors, musicians and other performers understand this all too well. Yet many presentations are not practiced until they are conducted live in front of the audience. Rehearsing your presentation will help you speak with confidence and stay on track. It also helps you to move away from vague ideas about content into the more concrete realm of what you will say and how you will say it. This does not mean that you need to learn a previously prepared script word-for-word, although I do recommend that you do this for the first minute or so. Rather, it involves saying words aloud, listening to yourself and reworking any dull, cumbersome or rough patches. The exact words may change slightly each time, but the gist of your speech remains the same.

Lack of Presence

A presenter with presence attracts the attention of the audience like a living magnet. People will focus on and listen to this sort of presenter, regardless of the topic. This is important because if your audience is focused on you and your words, your presentation has a much greater chance of succeeding. If your delivery is boring and lifeless and you fail to capture the attention of your audience, your message will likely fail to reach them.

Presence is very much about who you are, but not in the way that you might think. Authenticity and genuine desire to communicate with your audience are more important than a glib tongue and a gregarious personality16. You need to embody the power of your message, fully believe what you are saying and communicate the emotions behind your words.

Expressiveness and body language are important. However, you do not develop presence by artificially forcing yourself to adopt certain gestures or vocal techniques. Rather, you exude such things naturally when you care about both the topic and the audience.

Imagine how more effective you would be if you never uttered another word that you did not truly mean.

Inappropriate Visuals

Visuals, when used well, can enhance your presentation. In fact, research shows that over 75% of what people know has been obtained visually and that speaking combined with effective visuals is six times more effective than speaking alone17.

However, we are all too familiar with the idea of “death by PowerPoint™”, characterized by poorly constructed slides each overloaded with too much text and irrelevant clip art. Sadly, many unskilled presenters rely too heavily on their slides, attempting to hide their lack of knowledge and preparation. This problem is compounded by well-meaning software developers and novice slide authors who respectively create and use all sorts of irrelevant, distracting gizmos that detract from your message instead of enhancing it.

The answer to the problem starts with recognising that it is not the software that is to blame, but rather the way you choose to use it. Whether you are using PowerPoint, flipcharts or OHTs, you need to ensure that your visuals elucidate rather than compete with your message. For further details, see Deb’s post The Ten Commandments of Effective Visuals.

  1. Harvard Business School Press. “Backstage: Preparing for Presentations.” Chap. 7 in Business Communication, by Harvard Business School Press. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, 2006
  2. See Note 1
  3. Abela, Andrew. Advanced Presentations By Design. San Francisco: Pfieffer, 2008
  4. See Note 3 and Hattersley, Michael. “The Key to Making Better Presentations.” In Presentations That Persuade & Motivate, by Harvard Business School press, 29-41. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, 2004.
  5. Wilder, Claudyne. Point, click, wow! San Francisco: Pfieffer, 2008
  6. Presentations That Persuade & Motivate. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, 2004
  7. Cialdini, Robert B. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Collins, 2007.
  8. See the explanation of networks of association and schemas in chapter 7 of Burton, Lorelle, Drew Westen, and Robin Kowalski. Psychology. Brisbane: Wiley, 2009
  9. Nankervis, Allan, Robert Compton, and Marian Baird. “Training, developing and educating employees.” In Strategic Human Resource Management. Melbourne: Thomson, 2002.
  10. See Notes 3 & 6
  11. See Note 6
  12. See Notes 3, 5, & 6 as well as Weissman, Jerry. Presenting to Win: The Art of Telling Your Story. New York: Prentice Hall, 2003 & Harvard Business School Press. “The Knockout Presentation.” In Power, Influence & Persuasion. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, 2005.
  13. See Notes 3, 5 & 6 and Richardson, Robert, and S. Katharine Thayer. “Creating the Charismatic Presentation.” In The Charisma Factor. Prentice-Hall, 1993
  14. See Notes 5 & 6
  15. See Note 1
  16. President & Fellows of Harvard College. “Presence: How to Get It & How to Use It.” Harvard Management Communication Letter, May 1999 and Richardson, Robert, and S. Katharine Thayer. The Charisma Factor. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1993.
  17. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. Business Communication. Harvard Business School Press, 2003

{ 1 comment }

The Ten Commandments of Effective Visuals

by Deborah Kendell on August 23, 2009 · 1 comment

in Presentations

No Gravatar

10 Commandments of Effective VisualsIt is estimated that about 75% of the information that people take in occurs visually1. Therefore, it is a basic mistake to present without visuals2. However, we are all too familiar with the dreaded “death by PowerPoint” phenomenon. So how do you make effective use of visuals? To begin with, stop blaming the software and start looking at how you use it and other visuals. Then, follow these ten fundamental commandments for using visuals effectively.

  1. Thou shalt use visuals sparingly. The fact that many people learn visually does not mean that you should try to cram every element of your verbal message into a visual3. Focus less on quantity and more on quality. Do not be afraid to turn off irrelevant or competing visuals while you are talking and during other parts of your presentation.
  2. Thou shalt only use visuals for a reason. A good visual should add value to your verbal message 4, not just repeat it. In fact, text-based visuals can distract your audience from what you are saying 5. Too often, presenters create the visuals first and then decide what they will say. This is akin to the tail wagging the dog. Try deciding what you will say and what activities you will use before you create any visuals. Then only create visuals that enhance your message.
  3. Thou shalt ensure thy visuals look great. As obvious as this sounds, I am often amazed to see presenters who should know better using ready-made backgrounds in PowerPoint, making poor font choices and using colour indiscriminately. You should customize your background to suit the purpose of your presentation, the image of your organisation and the nature of your audience 6. You should choose a serif font style 7 and ensure that the size of your font is easy to read. Finally, you can consciously use colour to grab audience attention, amplify a message and persuade people to take action 8. However, indiscriminate and irrelevant colour hinders your audience’s ability to understand your message9.
  4. Thou shalt use minimal text on any visual. If you must use text, turn sentences into phrases, paragraphs into lists and single lists into grouped lists. The popular notion of seven points per slide and seven words per point is a myth10. The less text you use, the more impact your visuals will have. Clarity and conciseness are the key11.
  5. Thou shalt use simple diagrams. Diagrams are great at showing nearly any kind of relationship, from chronologically related timelines to categorically related hierarchies, and from procedurally related cause-effect chains to ongoing cycles. If you can put it in a diagram, do so. However, you need to ensure that your diagrams are simple enough for the audience to read and understand12.
  6. Thou shalt use graphs well. Statisticians agree that one of the best ways to intuitively grasp the significance of numbers is to show a graph13. Different graphs are suitable for different types of data. Line graphs work well for showing trends14, bar charts are best for showing comparisons 15 and scatter plots are an effective way to show relationships16. Research also suggests that horizontal bar graphs are more effective than vertical bar graphs17. Regardless of which graph type you use, you should generally avoid 3-D graphs, as they are visually misleading. However, you should make extensive use of effects that simplify and clarify your message, such as titles, labels, thick lines, simple numbers and callout boxes18. Generally, your graphs should follow the overall colour scheme used throughout your presentation, unless you are consciously using a colour to highlight a key point in the graph. Finally, it is important that you interpret the graph rather than just reading it.
  7. Thou shalt not use clip art…ever! Clip art is an example of a meaningless graphic 19 whose sole purpose is to fill up space. You can use pictures, but only if the picture is relevant and adds to the impact of your message. Some pictures add value subconsciously through the power of association, while you can use others as explicit talking points.
  8. Though shalt not make indiscriminate use of transitions and animations. Transitions are the optional effects that you can use within presentation software when moving from one slide to the next. You should not use transitions because they distract the audience with irrelevant visual detail. In fact, research shows that the indiscriminate use of transitions between slides is worse than using no visuals at all 20. Animations are a different type of effect where you make content items move or appear within a single slide. Most animations add no further value than static graphics and, as they are also visually distracting, you should generally avoid them. However, you can use animation in a small number of your slides if the animation has a specific purpose, such as telling a story or sequencing complex processes.
  9. Thou shalt not give out handouts before you have finished speaking. Giving out handouts before you speak embodies the very essence of why visuals are dangerous: distraction. You want people to focus on you and what you are saying. Handouts compete for your audience’s limited attention. If your audience is busy reading your handouts, they are not giving their full attention to you and your message. And, if they are not giving their full attention to you, they are less likely to remember or be moved by your presentation 21. Handouts are themselves an effective visual and they can be used to provide detail that cannot be conveyed on a slide or flip chart. However, handouts should always be given out after you have finished talking.
  10. Thou shalt let visuals do their work. At the more obvious end of the mistakes I see are presenters blocking a visual with their body, showing a visual so quickly that it can’t be understood, and competing for the audience’s attention while they are still trying to understand a visual.
  1. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. (2003). Business Communication. Harvard Business School Press.
  2. Clayton, J. (2004). Presentations 101. In Presentations that Persuade and Motivate. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  3. See note 2
  4. See note 1 & 2
  5. Humphrey, J. (2004). You are the Best Visual. In H. B. Press, Presentations That Persuade & Motivate. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing
  6. Wilder, C. (2008). Point, click, wow! San Francisco: Pfieffer.
  7. Wheildon, C. (2005). Type & Layout. Melbourne: The Worsley Press.
  8. Vogel, D., & Morrison, J. (1998). The impacts of presentation visuals on persuasion. 33 (3).
  9. Christ, R. E. (1975). Review and analysis of color coding research for visual display. Human Factors , 17.
  10. See Miller’s comments on this misinterpretation or subsequent faulty application of his research by those in the teaching/presentation field at http://members.shaw.ca/philipsharman/miller.txt
  11. See Note 6
  12. See Notes 1 & 2
  13. De Veaux, R., Velleman, P., & Bock, D. (2009). Intro Stats. Boston: Pearson
  14. Shah, P., Mayer, R., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Graphs as aids to knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Psychology , 9 (14), 690-702
  15. Cleveland, W., & McGill, R. (1984). Graphical perception. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 79 (38), 531-554.
  16. Lewandowsky, S., & Spence, I. (1989). Discriminating strata in scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 84 (407), 682-688.
  17. Jarvenpaa, S., & Dickson, G. (1988). Graphics and managerial decision-making: Research based guidelines. Communications of the ACM , 31 (6), 764-774
  18. See note 6.
  19. Abela, A. (2008). Advanced presentations by design. San Francisco: Pfieffer
  20. See Note 8.
  21. Schacter, D. The seven sins of memory. American Psychologist , 54, 182-203

{ 1 comment }

Training + Coaching: A Winning Combination

by Deborah Kendell on July 27, 2009 · 1 comment

in Executive Coaching

No Gravatar

HR and L&D professionals understand that training is an investment, not an expense. Market investors do not look for the cheapest shares they can lay hands on. Rather, they are more concerned with investing in shares that bring them the highest return. In a similar way, savvy HR executives would do well to invest their limited training budgets into activities that will produce human resource returns such as increased productivity.

If training is to deliver real returns, then people must convert what they learn into new ways of acting within the workplace. I think we can all remember leaving a program armed with good intentions that soon get lost amidst the many demands on our time at work. In fact, research suggests that only 15-22% of learning is transferred back into workplace behaviour and subsequent changes in productivity.

In other words, you can generally expect a 15-22% return on your training investment. Would you be happy with this return if you knew that some programs produce an 88% return on investment? Probably not. And now you do not have to.

Research by Gerald Olivero1 showed that productivity increases following training quadrupled if they were followed by one-on-one coaching sessions. As few as three thirty-minutes sessions are sufficient to effect a dramatic increase in your return on investment.

The Smarter Way To Invest

The Smarter Way To Invest

I understand that all of you have limited training budgets, and in these tight times, you have as much chance of success at asking for more as young Oliver Twist. However, my advice is simple: do less training, but spend your money more wisely by adding follow-up coaching to any training that you do offer.

  1. Olivero, G., Bane, K.D., & Kopelman, R.E. (1997). Executive coaching as a transfer of training tool: Effects on productivity in a public agency. 26(4), 461-469. Public Personnel Management.

{ 1 comment }

Leadership Development Tools

by Deborah Kendell on June 29, 2009 · 2 comments

in Assessments

No Gravatar

Do you need to know what resources are available to use in your leadership development programs and where to get them? If so, Leadership Resources: A Guide to Training & Development Tools is book worth buying.

It is a comprehensive list of assessments, exercises, videos and other resources that you can use to enhance your program. The book is published by the Center for Creative Leadership, a not-for-profit organisation whose expertise I trust. The resources listed within the book are drawn from a wide array of companies. You can preview the book here.

You may also like to preview the Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment.

{ 2 comments }